I’ve had many conversations lately with partners and prospects regarding IP camera capabilities and more specifically, the merits of Megapixel and PTZ cameras. While each camera type has its own unique set of pros and cons, it’s easy to get caught up in cutting edge technology that’s available versus what’s actually necessary.

The necessity of a PTZ camera is largely determined by the presence of a live operator to control the camera. There are several environments where this is particularly handy, such as high-end retailers, big-box retailers, banks, casinos and airports. This gives LP and security personnel the ability to track suspects and zoom in for better detail using live video.

However, what happens to the larger field of view when zooming in on a narrow square-foot of view? If there’s a commotion on one end of a jewelry display which draws the close attention of the camera, the other end of the display is not only out of view, but not being recorded either. Organized crime rings have figured this out. Further, without a live operator, a PTZ camera defaults to a stationary fixed-view camera.

For the rest of the pack who do not have live operators on PTZ controls, Megapixel cameras offer some unique advantages. First is the clarity of the higher resolution. Second is the wide field of view. These advantages offer a superior coverage area and digital zoom capability without compromising clarity. In many instances, Megapixel cameras offer superb coverage and clarity without taking any eye off the bigger picture and without the need for live operation.

In most cases, standard re or hi-res analog cameras will be plenty of technology. Sure there’s better, just be sure you’re getting what’s necessary and appropriate for your situation.