Subscribe

Managed Video as a Service

The place to learn about and discuss Managed Video as a Service

NASDAQ in Times Square, New York City.Image via Wikipedia

A couple days ago Matt Steinfort posted on the significant investment dollars that are funding both start-up and well established companies in the broader video market.

Is this another case of irrational exuberance?  Not by a long shot.

Capital infusions of this significance are not executed on a whim.  The investors conduct extensive research on the company seeking investment and the greater landscape of the marketplace.  They must be convinced that the target company is in a segment poised for growth, and that the team assembled is capable and well-positioned to capture a portion of this growth.

Investing in the absence of either is simply hoping that the “greater fools theory” prevails. 

Contributing to the attractiveness of the video market are projections referenced in stories like this one.  In a recent report, ABI Research projected that the video surveillance market (which includes surveillance cameras, computers and storage, professional services and hardware infranstructure) is poised to grow to $46.0 billion by 2013 from $13.5 billion in 2006. 

This is an annual compounded growth rate of nearly 20% per year! 

This type of projected growth tends to draw a crowd, and suggests that MVaaS providers and partners are in the right place at the right time.  Carpe diem!

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

1 Responsed To This Post

Subscribes to this post comment rss or trackback url
mygif_alt
John Honovich said, July 12th, 2008 at 7:43 pm

I talk to VC investors and analysts fairly regularly and rarely do they demonstrate that they have done significant research. I love the analyst in the story quoted: "Schatt said that while digital technology has a clear advantage over analog systems—higher resolution, more efficient storage, easier search and retrieval—there remain a number of traditional security suppliers who are not totally comfortable with shifting to full digital implementation. Widespread training is thus recommended, he said." This quote makes it crystal clear that he does not understand the key strategic issues involved – as if training was the missing link, lol . . . I will say, as to the two specific deals announced this week, Milestone looks sound and VideoIQ looks questionable. Milestone is an acknowledged market leader with a defined and viable business model. On the other hand,VideoIQ recently radically changed their product offering from video analytic provider to embedding NVRs into cameras. This is a big risk for its investors as VideoIQ's new approach has not been validated in the marketed and the product itself has real question marks. Maybe their investors understand these risks and priced them in. The terms of the deals are not disclosed. So I think Milestone is in the right place at the right time but I would not be surprised if VideoIQ was an act of irrational exuberance.

Response To This Topic

Please Note: The comment moderation maybe active so there is no need to resubmit your comment