<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will standards ever happen?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://managedvideoblog.com/2008/07/09/will-standards-ever-happen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://managedvideoblog.com/2008/07/09/will-standards-ever-happen/</link>
	<description>The place to learn about and discuss Managed Video as a Service</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:48:50 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dloher</title>
		<link>http://managedvideoblog.com/2008/07/09/will-standards-ever-happen/comment-page-1/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>dloher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managedvideoblog.com/?p=152#comment-179</guid>
		<description>One way to get standards is to just start making them, using them and releasing them as you go.  There&#039;s quite a bit of precedent for this in the Internet.  However you&#039;re right John, it takes years for adoption.      Another benefit to what the IETF calls the rough consensus and running code model of standards building is you&#039;re not betting the farm on a stack of paper which proposes some future way of doing things.  Rather, you&#039;re blazing a trail developing solutions to problems working with partners.     </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One way to get standards is to just start making them, using them and releasing them as you go.  There&#039;s quite a bit of precedent for this in the Internet.  However you&#039;re right John, it takes years for adoption.      Another benefit to what the IETF calls the rough consensus and running code model of standards building is you&#039;re not betting the farm on a stack of paper which proposes some future way of doing things.  Rather, you&#039;re blazing a trail developing solutions to problems working with partners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Honovich</title>
		<link>http://managedvideoblog.com/2008/07/09/will-standards-ever-happen/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>John Honovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managedvideoblog.com/?p=152#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt, Thanks for the post.  While you are probably more optimistic than me, I do think we will get standards . . . eventually.  The problem is I doubt you will see them widely adopted for the next 5 years.  Standards adoption takes a long time and video surveillance standards are still in a fairly early stage.    Because it&#039;s probably going to take 5 years (or more), I think it&#039;s prudent that anyone buying or building systems simply ignore standards and focus on optimizing their solutions for a non-standard world.  The alternative, to me, is that you bank on standards and then your project is undermined or your product&#039;s reach is severely constrained because you do not integrate using proprietary interfaces.    In any event, I&#039;d be very interested to learn more about Envysion&#039;s plan for interfacing with multiple DVR manufacturers.  It is certainly an important element for a successful MVaaS offering.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt, Thanks for the post.  While you are probably more optimistic than me, I do think we will get standards . . . eventually.  The problem is I doubt you will see them widely adopted for the next 5 years.  Standards adoption takes a long time and video surveillance standards are still in a fairly early stage.    Because it&#039;s probably going to take 5 years (or more), I think it&#039;s prudent that anyone buying or building systems simply ignore standards and focus on optimizing their solutions for a non-standard world.  The alternative, to me, is that you bank on standards and then your project is undermined or your product&#039;s reach is severely constrained because you do not integrate using proprietary interfaces.    In any event, I&#039;d be very interested to learn more about Envysion&#039;s plan for interfacing with multiple DVR manufacturers.  It is certainly an important element for a successful MVaaS offering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
