Subscribe

Managed Video as a Service

The place to learn about and discuss Managed Video as a Service

John Honovich, who has a very good blog/news site dedicated to IP video, posted a good comment a couple weeks back on why he believes it is unlikely traditional DVR manufacturers and video providers will develop standards around how they can be accessed.

I’m still trying to figure out how to link to his comment (I will update the post with the link as soon as I can) so you can read it yourself.  One of the arguments that he makes is that the differences amongst all the various DVRs, like the quality of the video that is recorded, will make it difficult for another company, perhaps one that provides analytics, to effectively interface with that recorder.  His conclusion is then that video providers should recognize that the industry will lack these standards and shape their business plan accordingly.

While I’m probably more optimistic than John is about whether the industry will adopt some level of standards, I’m also a realist and agree that it will be a long time before anything meaningful happens on that front – much longer than we would ever factor into our near time business model.  In the meantime, we have been thinking about ways to interface with multiple DVR manufacturers with our MVaaS solution to increase our addressable market.  More on that later.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

2 Responsed To This Post

Subscribes to this post comment rss or trackback url
mygif_alt
John Honovich said, July 10th, 2008 at 10:53 am

Hi Matt, Thanks for the post. While you are probably more optimistic than me, I do think we will get standards . . . eventually. The problem is I doubt you will see them widely adopted for the next 5 years. Standards adoption takes a long time and video surveillance standards are still in a fairly early stage. Because it's probably going to take 5 years (or more), I think it's prudent that anyone buying or building systems simply ignore standards and focus on optimizing their solutions for a non-standard world. The alternative, to me, is that you bank on standards and then your project is undermined or your product's reach is severely constrained because you do not integrate using proprietary interfaces. In any event, I'd be very interested to learn more about Envysion's plan for interfacing with multiple DVR manufacturers. It is certainly an important element for a successful MVaaS offering.

mygif
dloher said, July 10th, 2008 at 5:46 pm

One way to get standards is to just start making them, using them and releasing them as you go. There's quite a bit of precedent for this in the Internet. However you're right John, it takes years for adoption. Another benefit to what the IETF calls the rough consensus and running code model of standards building is you're not betting the farm on a stack of paper which proposes some future way of doing things. Rather, you're blazing a trail developing solutions to problems working with partners.

Response To This Topic

Please Note: The comment moderation maybe active so there is no need to resubmit your comment