Subscribe

Managed Video as a Service

The place to learn about and discuss Managed Video as a Service

In my last post I gave some highlights of customers conversations at this past week’s NRF LP show.  I also talked to a number of current and potential channel partners for MVaaS services.   While there are a number of potential channels that weren’t represented at the show, there were a couple channel segments that were represented.

Traditional security providers

I’d like to see the marketing budgets at the companies as they are at every loss prevention and security show I have ever seen, and when they go, they bring at least a dozen people with them.  It either speaks to the amount of business that they do in this space or to an industry-wide lack of concern over expenses.  I’m guessing the former.  These companies sell video, access control, alarms, etc to the retail and restaurant providers.  They have all been around for a long long time and have deep personal relationships with the industry practioners.  They are all very familiar with video.  My general experience with this category of partner, which was consistent with the conversations at the show, is that these guys understand the market, see the value of MVaaS (particularly the recurring revenue piece) but are a little uncertain how to proceed.  Their biggest challenge is the installed base of traditional DVRs that they have in place.  They want an MVaaS solution that can work for their customers on their existing DVRs.  This speaks to the need for standards on how to communicate across vendor platforms, something the MVaaS industry really needs to tackle to take full advantage of the opportunity.

Remote Monitoring Companies

I talked to several service providers that put eyes on video for their customers.  They provide remote guard services, operational audits and just about anything that a customer would want them to watch.  Some are evolving out of the central monitoring station model and are looking to expand the breadth of their services and see MVaaS and the integration with POS and other systems as way to add more value for their customers.  Others are entering the space using offshore monitoring resources.  These guys definitely get it.  Their challenge is incorporating an MVaaS solution into the central monitoring software and systems they are already using to monitor video and alarms so that they don’t have to use their legacy systems and a separate MVaaS service.  Again, this speaks to the need to have some communication standards in the industry so that MVaaS services can be easily integrated into some of the common central station tools, such as MAS.

There were a number of other potential partner segments at the show, but I’ll cover these in a subsequent post as they aren’t traditional channel partners.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

2 Responsed To This Post

Subscribes to this post comment rss or trackback url
mygif_alt
John Honovich said, June 28th, 2008 at 11:23 am

I have dealt with the same issue of customers wanting new solutions to work with existing DVRs. While standards could theoretically help here, the best case scenario is that it will take years for legacy DVR companies to adopt standards. As such, I am not convinced that it is practical to consider standards or hope that standards will help one's cause. Secondly, even if legacy DVRs adopted standards you still have potential other constraints. For instance, let's say you are performing video analytics using a connection to a legacy DVR. Legacy DVRs frequently record at CIF which can undermine the performance of analytics (who often need 4CIF to achieve sufficient pixel density). That being said, this many not be applicable to your solution. In any event, based on my personal experience, I think the best strategy in this market assumes standards will not be available and that you will adapt to that condition. I would be interested to hear your thoughts on this?

mygif
Darren Loher said, June 30th, 2008 at 1:31 pm

The remote access capabilities are often quite constrained for many legacy DVR's. They need at least some software to be added to them to make them fully functional when accessed remotely. So far it seems existing DVR's manufacturers are not exactly setup to allow 3rd party software to be added to or run on their existing DVR's. It's not clear if they want to open up their platform either. It's probably fair to say that they need some kind of financial incentive to open their kimono at least a little bit to support an integration effort. With the possibility of adding recurring revenue to one's installed base of equipment, it seems like there should be some interest. Each player in the game has to decide if they want to build an MVaaS solution from scratch on not. I think there is at least some movement to use MVaaS software from one vendor and using equipment from a variety of suppliers. This movement seems focused in the IP network video area, but perhaps the legacy DVR suppliers will open up if given a workable financial incentive. :)

Response To This Topic

Please Note: The comment moderation maybe active so there is no need to resubmit your comment