Subscribe

Managed Video as a Service

The place to learn about and discuss Managed Video as a Service

Monday, I talked about network plug-and-play. Today, let’s explore how to get your IP camera to work with an MVaaS provider. To start with, you probably need to go hunting for someone with some FM skills. Why? Because there are not yet standards defined to allow any IP camera to communicate with any MVaaS provider.

Why would I want my IP camera to work with an MVaaS provider? There are several reasons. The first one is simple: youtube. Why is youtube successful? Very simply, it’s because video files are big, easily 1 megabyte/minute for low resolution (320×240). You can’t send a 5 minute video to a friend via email because the attachment is just too large. But, you can upload that video to a central site, and then send a link to your friend. There are probably 50 youtube clones out in the Internet today for just this reason.

What else can MVaaS do for my IP cameras? It can provide tools for sharing. It can provide an integration of your video with other business data such as Point of Sale events. It can persist (save) your video indefinitely. It can provide a high-volume, reliable distribution point for streaming your clip to others that is unaffected by your local Internet broadband capacity. It can provide an interface to video analytics services. The list is limited only by your imagination and wallet.

What kind of innovation would help customers use IP cameras with MVaaS? What types of standards would be helpful?

How about a dynamic configuration protocol designed for a wide area network? A protocol that would allow an IP camera to register itself with an MVaaS, exchange configuration information, and begin streaming video to the MVaaS remote storage. How could I use that if it was implemented across MVaaS and IP camera vendors? Simple: I could plug any IP camera in, anywhere in the Internet, and it would start inter-working with any MVaaS provider, automatically.

And most importantly, it would work without the need for any FM!

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

1 Responsed To This Post

Subscribes to this post comment rss or trackback url
mygif_alt
John Honovich said, June 25th, 2008 at 10:35 am

Hi Robert, I think a WAN dynamic configuration protocol would be quite valuable. Thanks for an insightful post. Two questions: 1. With your customers today, are you recommending the use of IP cameras over analog? And if so, are a lot moving to IP? 2. With sending video over the WAN, are you concerned about limited upstream bandwidth capacity? I know you work with a lot of QSRs. While my experience with QSRs is far less than yours, I know a number you just have DSL or are just moving to DSL now. The concern would be, though you could conceptually connect any IP cameras to any MVaas provider, the bandwidth constraints would cause significant issues. Best, John

Response To This Topic

Please Note: The comment moderation maybe active so there is no need to resubmit your comment