Subscribe

Managed Video as a Service

The place to learn about and discuss Managed Video as a Service

Yesterday I linked to two recent earnings releases, and asked the question – Who’s bigger?

If you answered “it depends”, you were correct.  It is not possible to answer this question without knowing the basis of comparison.

Should the size of an enterprise be based on reveneues?  How about profits?  Total assets?  Number of employees?  

In the first quarter of 2008, GM recorded $42.7 billion (with a “b”) in revenues.  Salesforce.com recognized only $248 million in their first quarter.  GM has 266,000 employees worldwide.  Salesforce.com is still under 3,000.  GM has nearly $149 billion in total assets.  Salesforce, on the other hand, has only $1.1 billion.*

GM is clearly the larger company, right?

But what about profitability?  GM has been posting recent losses, including a $3.3 billion first quarter loss.  Salesforce.com posted $18.4 million in income in their first quarter.*

So, Salesforce.com is the winner, right?

But haven’t I missed another important measure?

 

* Data sourced from either the earnings releases or annual SEC filings.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

1 Responsed To This Post

Subscribes to this post comment rss or trackback url
mygif_alt
Dan Caruso said, June 3rd, 2008 at 11:45 am

yes you did…market value

Response To This Topic

Please Note: The comment moderation maybe active so there is no need to resubmit your comment