<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s bigger &#8211; GM or Salesforce.com?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://managedvideoblog.com/2008/06/02/whos-bigger-gm-or-salesforcecom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://managedvideoblog.com/2008/06/02/whos-bigger-gm-or-salesforcecom/</link>
	<description>The place to learn about and discuss Managed Video as a Service</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:51:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Richardson</title>
		<link>http://managedvideoblog.com/2008/06/02/whos-bigger-gm-or-salesforcecom/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 14:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managedvideoblog.com/?p=72#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Interesting corollary. IMO the car industry has faltered for the precise reasons that companies like Salesforce.com have succeeded.
(1) Platforms - Salesforce has built a platform and allowed customers to build/tweak on top of it
(2) Passion - Salesforce has a call to arms...&quot;the end of software&quot;. GM&#039;s current call to arms, &quot;don&#039;t die&quot; which enspires you
(3) Customization - Built on the platform pillar, Salesforce now allows you to build ANY tool on their platform. Could the car industry pull that off (umm..hello...Scion?)

Salesforce.com fundamentally changed the &quot;software&quot; industry by offering something completely new, built around a customizable platform and a passion with a call to action. The auto industry is still &quot;trying to keep up with Japan&quot; and are failing. 

To sound like Tom Peters...go where the competition is not. What about a collaborative platform car(s) customized to my needs/wants? What about just flat beating the Japanese to the punch on electric or fuel cell technology? 

This should be our generations &quot;Land a Man on the Moon&quot; call to action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting corollary. IMO the car industry has faltered for the precise reasons that companies like Salesforce.com have succeeded.<br />
(1) Platforms &#8211; Salesforce has built a platform and allowed customers to build/tweak on top of it<br />
(2) Passion &#8211; Salesforce has a call to arms&#8230;&#8221;the end of software&#8221;. GM&#8217;s current call to arms, &#8220;don&#8217;t die&#8221; which enspires you<br />
(3) Customization &#8211; Built on the platform pillar, Salesforce now allows you to build ANY tool on their platform. Could the car industry pull that off (umm..hello&#8230;Scion?)</p>
<p>Salesforce.com fundamentally changed the &#8220;software&#8221; industry by offering something completely new, built around a customizable platform and a passion with a call to action. The auto industry is still &#8220;trying to keep up with Japan&#8221; and are failing. </p>
<p>To sound like Tom Peters&#8230;go where the competition is not. What about a collaborative platform car(s) customized to my needs/wants? What about just flat beating the Japanese to the punch on electric or fuel cell technology? </p>
<p>This should be our generations &#8220;Land a Man on the Moon&#8221; call to action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Willys Jeep v. SaaS &#124; Salesforce Times</title>
		<link>http://managedvideoblog.com/2008/06/02/whos-bigger-gm-or-salesforcecom/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>The Willys Jeep v. SaaS &#124; Salesforce Times</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 08:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managedvideoblog.com/?p=72#comment-40</guid>
		<description>[...] Part one of &#8220;mwilson&#8221;&#8217;s post is here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part one of &#8220;mwilson&#8221;&#8217;s post is here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Loher</title>
		<link>http://managedvideoblog.com/2008/06/02/whos-bigger-gm-or-salesforcecom/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Loher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 04:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managedvideoblog.com/?p=72#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Something I get tired of seeing is a lot of talk about is how great having lots of revenue is without talking about any other financial metrics.    I am glad to see this post because I can tell it&#039;s not going to be about revenue.

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something I get tired of seeing is a lot of talk about is how great having lots of revenue is without talking about any other financial metrics.    I am glad to see this post because I can tell it&#8217;s not going to be about revenue.</p>
<p> <img src='http://managedvideoblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Caruso</title>
		<link>http://managedvideoblog.com/2008/06/02/whos-bigger-gm-or-salesforcecom/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Caruso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 23:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managedvideoblog.com/?p=72#comment-37</guid>
		<description>great post!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great post!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
